News 
 Local News 
 News 
 General 
 A heritage headache 

A heritage headache

20 Feb, 2012 09:41 AM

GOULBURN Mulwaree Council may set up a Heritage Working Group to simplify the preservation of significant past and future heritage buildings.

Tomorrow night’s council meeting will consider a motion from Cr Neil Penning, which, if passed, will establish the group.

Cr Penning says Council has many policy documents that try to manage Goulburn’s past and future heritage buildings.

“Some of the ways these documents have been interpreted over the years have been good – like 127 Bourke Street (Capital Pathology building) – replacing insignificant old buildings with a new, contemporary, functional building that fits the streetscape,” he says.

“Sometimes we have interpreted these documents badly, to produce the fake heritage buildings – like 175 Auburn Street (Something Special and Super Cheap building) – that most of the community are now railing against.”

Cr Penning says there’s now “a reasonable level of confusion” in the community as to what people can do with their old buildings or sites, and what is expected of them.

“Council has heritage advisors who try to match the increasing maze of opinion and policy on this very subjective problem.”

His solution? A Council Heritage Working Group to review all existing heritage documents and report to Council in July on anomalies and amendments that would “simplify the preservation of our significant past, and build our significant future heritage”.

Council’s acting General Manager, Chris Stewart comments: “To facilitate the establishment of the Working Party and ensure the 2012 timeframe is met, it is recommended that Council nominate members (for the Working Party) as part of any resolution to this motion.

“Some suggestions put forward for committee membership: nominated Councillor(s); Council’s Heritage Advisor; Goulburn Heritage Group representative; Gary Dutaillis; Michelle Hazelgrove. Once the Working Party is formed additional members may be added.”

Mr Stewart says the July deadline for the review is achievable. But any subsequent amendments to Council policies and plans “may take considerable time to finalise”.

Print
Increase Text Size
Decrease Text Size

comments


Date: Newest first | Oldest first
And how much will this cost the ratepayer? Yet again an abrogation of responsibility and transference of responsibility is proposed by the clowncil.

Clearly, this is an admission of confusion and we now know why they chop and change at whim.

Bring on the elections, hopefully changes will occur!

Posted by Lithium yum yum, 20/02/2012 11:18:25 AM, on Goulburn Post
No wonder property owners are confused, council itself is confused and finally they admit it. But that didn't stop them knocking down heritage properties for the council offices, did it. Let's give this matter to people who understand the realities and are CONSISTENT.
Posted by You are kidding me, 20/02/2012 11:46:09 AM, on Goulburn Post
There's better time than right now to preserve what's left of the old buildings. What has happened in the past can't now be undone, so if this ends the confusion about build heritage in Goulburn it's a really good thing; then council will learn from it so nobody makes the same mistakes again.
Posted by Do it now, 20/02/2012 4:21:34 PM, on Goulburn Post
Sounds like Council's recognising that Heritage is a significant matter for the Goulburn community and needs to take steps to improve the process, especially in terms of heritage outcomes. Goulburn's heritage is too important to get lost in a process that doesn't work for anyone. Working groups have their pros and cons, and it all depends on who's on it and what their role is. Looking forward to hearing more on this.

And good on the Post for keeping us informed on this critical issue!


Posted by Let's keep as much as we can, 21/02/2012 12:19:08 PM, on Goulburn Post
Goulburn Heritage Group representative (s), for example Mr David Penalver, should be part of the Council Heritage Working Group. This would give the council heritage group some expert advice.
Posted by Give the heritage group a seat, 21/02/2012 1:28:30 PM, on Goulburn Post
@do it now, I fully agree with you. There is a better time than right now to preserve old buildings. By my reckoning it is 2099!


Posted by I no unnerstand, 21/02/2012 5:26:14 PM, on Goulburn Post
@ I no understand, thanks for pointing out the omission of a word in my earlier comment. The better time is 2012. Preferably it was in back in 1999, but they missed that date due to 'poor' reading of the planning laws, opportunistic developers, and people who don't care about heritage buildings, so 2012 will have to do.
Posted by Do it now, 22/02/2012 8:04:48 AM, on Goulburn Post
It is well known that for those who continue to live in the past, their life is history!
Posted by Material People, 22/02/2012 4:21:19 PM, on Goulburn Post
It is well know that for those who cannot remember the past, their life is is doomed to repeat it.
Posted by Counteractive Material People, 22/02/2012 9:16:36 PM, on Goulburn Post
Live in the present, remember the past, and fear not the future, for it doesn't exist and never shall. There is only now.
Posted by Chris Paolini, 23/02/2012 8:31:10 AM, on Goulburn Post
1 | 2  |  next >

post a comment


Screen name  *
Email address  *
Remember me?
Comment  *
 
We invite and encourage our readers to post comments. Comments are moderated and will appear as soon as our editor has approved them. When posting comments you agree to be bound by our Terms and Conditions.
SIMPLICITY: Cr Neil Penning wants to establish a Heritage Working Group to simplify the preservation of significant buildings and approval of new buildings. He cited the Capital Pathology building in Bourke St as an example of a good interpretation of the guidelines and the Something Special building as a bad example.
SIMPLICITY: Cr Neil Penning wants to establish a Heritage Working Group to simplify the preservation of significant buildings and approval of new buildings. He cited the Capital Pathology building in Bourke St as an example of a good interpretation of the guidelines and the Something Special building as a bad example.

Most popular articles

Goulburn Automotive 040512

Lawrence and Hansen


Goulburn Post







Weather brought to you by:

Weatherzone

Front Page

Current Issue
Privacy Policy | Conditions of Use | Advertising Terms | Copyright © 2012. Fairfax Media.
 SEND...
 SAVE...
 SHARE...