The Shooters, Fishers and Farmers (SFF) party is accusing Goulburn's sitting MP of "hypocrisy" over the proposed waste to energy facility at Tarago.
Subscribe now for unlimited access.
$0/
(min cost $0)
or signup to continue reading
Party leader Robert Borsak and Goulburn branch president, Andy Wood have criticised Liberal MP Wendy Tuckerman's recent parliamentary notice of motion.
READ MORE:
It called on the government to:
- "Listen to and support regional communities by standing against the Tarago proposal and banning waste incineration not only in Sydney, but across NSW;
- Acknowledge the NSW chief scientist and engineer's report which stipulated that waste incineration facilities should not be in proximity to food production;
- Note the impacts and job losses which an incinerator will cause across agriculture and food production in regional NSW and:
- Increase funding towards the circular economy rather than resorting to burning Sydney's rubbish in the regions."
The motion hasn't yet been debated but SFF has taken a swipe at its content and timing.
"It is the height of hypocrisy that Mrs Tuckerman is now saying she is listening to regional communities by standing against the Tarago incinerator," Mr Borsak said.
"She had four years in government, including two as the minister for local government and did nothing."
But Mrs Tuckerman said she made no apology for "standing against (the project) from the outset.
"(It was) against a decision by a government I was a part of, against a decision to allocate four precincts to ensure these incinerators weren't popping up everywhere across NSW," she said.
"SFF representatives need to stop the hypocrisy and 'shooting the messenger' with your ineffective local politics, represent the people you claim to represent and advocate to make this your party's priority instead of seeking headlines that detail just how little you've done."
Veolia Environmental Services has proposed a $600 million 'advanced energy recovery centre' at its Woodlawn bioreactor near Tarago. It aims to burn up to 380,000 tonnes annually of residual waste feedstock, otherwise destined for landfill. The associated power plant would generate up to 240,000 megawatts of energy each year.
But the plan has generated a storm of controversy, with up to 600 objections lodged with the state's planning department. Goulburn Mulwaree Council has also opposed the state significant project.
Mr Wood said Mrs Tuckerman's words were "hollow" and "tokenistic" and she could have been more strident in her opposition while in government.
"She was in cabinet and serious things could have been done to stop it," he said.
"It's like someone throwing you a ball and standing back pretending to catch it. We all know she wasn't serious about about it and (the notice of motion) is adding insult to injury to make herself look good.
Mr Wood said "unlike Mrs Tuckerman, (SFF) didn't need the NSW chief scientist and engineer to tell us the bleeding obvious, than an incinerator should not be in the vicinity of food production areas."
"The proposed incinerator will wreck the niche and boutique food and wine industry that is growing in our area," he said.
However Mrs Tuckerman publicly opposed the project as far back as November 2021. At a residents' gathering in Tarago she said: "Let it be known and clear: I do not want an incinerator anywhere in the Goulburn electorate."
"It is very clear the Tarago community stance on this issue and I stand with them. In a rural setting, abundant in food production I do not want an incinerator...We will fight this."
The same month she also told parliament the NSW chief scientist's report didn't provide her any certainty the incinerator wouldn't "threaten" human and environmental health.
In June, 2022, the MP also presented a 500 plus signature public petition to NSW Parliament asking that the Southern Goulburn Mulwaree Precinct be removed from permissable locations for waste to energy plants.
Asked what SFF was doing to oppose Veolia's plan, Mr Wood said the party was dealing with different issues as they arose with the government.
"At the moment they are dealing with big issues regarding the timber industry on the north coast and brumby culling in the Snowy Mountains," he said.
"We're forging a relationship with government where we can have a working relationship but still challenge things as they come along."
Mr Wood said he strongly opposed Veolia's project and had met again with residents this week.
Mrs Tuckerman said it was ironic that SFF representatives "could find enough time to seek publicity for their criticisms of her actions but in the same breath stated it is was not their party's priority."
"We now have an Environment Minister who was staunchly opposed to an incinerator in Sydney and when in opposition called for them to be banned in NSW, but now refuses to meet with the farmers who will be impacted," she said.
Meantime, the NSW Planning and Environment department has called on Veolia to further consider how the project is in the public interest, given the number of objections. It has also asked for more information on human and environmental health impacts, beyond that provided in an EIS.
Our journalists work hard to provide local, up-to-date news to the community. This is how you can access our trusted content:
- Bookmark our website
- Follow us on Twitter
- Follow us on Google News
- Make sure you are signed up for our breaking news and regular newsletters